Trademark Clause In Partnership Agreement

They do not constitute or act representatives of SYB or its licensees and are not authorized to act on behalf of or on behalf of an agreement or other obligation on behalf of SYB or its licensees, or to provide a condition or other guarantee, or to represent on behalf of SYB or its licensees; and in the event that the manufactured products were sold by the declarant under a specific brand directly to specific customers and partly by the opponent to certain customers, the brand`s co-ownership is refused in such a scenario. From a global perspective, cases have gone through the agency, which makes a clear distinction between ownership and the distribution of finances. Not all co-owners of the brand have a quantification of their rights to trademark ownership. However, the financial result of the use of the mark can be quantified and controlled by the terms defined and mentioned in the contract or in the co-ownership agreement. Common ownership of trademarks is generally confused with co-ownership and, as a result, it has been repeatedly established that the licensing between the parties serves as a guarantee of trust in order to preserve the interests related to the property. Don`t use, Register or register trademarks, company names, company names, company names, usernames, usernames or user groups or other means of identification on social media sites (z.B. Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram) that are identical or similar to any of SYB`s brands or other trademarks or its licensees, or their derivation, whether they are alone or with other brands. or, the word, logo or symbol, whether during or after the duration of the partnership agreement, in any country in the world; The partner undertakes to market the services only under the brand names defined by SYB. Under no circumstances does the partner (i) market services under other brand names or (ii) under SYB-designated trademarks in combination with other brands, trade names, domain names, words or symbols, “line tag,” “sleep line” or “enhanced declaration,” whether in the possession of the partner or a third party, including co-branding, double-branding or other combinations.

Comments are closed.